Hi, Jason,
Leave to appeal was granted in January this year in MWB v Rock. As far as I know (and the beauty of a list is that this view avails itself of a quick correction from other recipients) the appeal is to proceed.
With kind regards,
Catharine
Professor Catharine MacMillan
The Dickson Poon School of Law
King's College London
Strand
London WC2R 2LS
tel: +44 7848-5930
Sent: 07 November 2017 16:46:20
To: obligations@uwo.ca
Subject: ODG: MWB v Rock Advertising
Dear Colleagues:
Has anyone heard whether MWB v Rock Advertising [2016] EWCA Civ 553 is going to the Supreme Court? I find it shocking the ease with which the court of appeal disregards Foakes v Beer and its earlier decision in Selectmove. I also find it odd the reverence that the court (and UK commentators) seem to have for Williams v Roffey Bros. For the reasons given in M Roberts, “The Practical Benefit Doctrine Marches On” (2017) 80 MLR 339 it seems clear that Williams is bad law that is inconsistent with the traditional requirements of consideration (move from, bargained for, coterminous with) and ultimately destructive of the idea of a contractual obligation that is binding on the party subject to it.
First, vicarious liability now the law of contract. Oh well.
Sincerely,
Jason Neyers
Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
Western University
Law Building Rm 26
e. jneyers@uwo.ca
t. 519.661.2111 (x88435)